Thursday, February 24, 2005

Bernard Hopkins: Greatest Middleweight Ever?

Bernard HopkinsUndisputed middleweight champ Bernard Hopkins, fresh off a typically methodical unanimous decision over Howard Eastman, has successfully defended his title an incredible 20 consecutive times. In an era of alphabet titles, Hopkins’ victory over Eastman also represented the first time a fighter had ever defended the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO titles. For many years, Bernard Hopkins resented what he felt was a lack of appreciation by the boxing public. After stopping both Felix Trinidad and Oscar De La Hoya for the first times in their respective careers, a lack of respect is no longer an issue. Hopkins is considered the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world today – unprecedented for a 40-year-old. In fact, the discussion surrounding Hopkins now centers on just where he belongs among the greatest middleweights of all-time. So, just where does he belong?

The middleweight division has been home to some of the greatest fighters in history, including Sugar Ray Robinson, Harry Greb, Carlos Monzon and Marvin Hagler. Other great middleweights include Mickey Walker, Charley Burley, Jake LaMotta, Stanley Ketchel, Marcel Cerdan and Tony Zale. Sugar Ray Leonard and Roy Jones Jr. were also champs at 160, though they enjoyed the majority of their success in other weight classes.

While critics cite a lack of quality opposition as a knock on Hopkins, it’s not his fault that the division was less than stellar for much of his career. Also, much like Roy Jones in the light heavyweight division, Hopkins played a large role in creating the impression that his fellow middleweights were a mediocre bunch. Here are the victims of Hopkins middleweight reign:

01/27/96 - Steve Frank - KO1
03/16/96 - Joe Lipsey - KO4 – Lipsey was 25-0 at the time.
07/16/96 - Bo James - KO11
04/19/97 - John David Jackson - KO7
07/20/97 - Glencoffe Johnson - KO11 – Johnson was 32-0 at the time and recently defeated Roy Jones and Antonio Tarver.
11/18/97 - Andrew Council - W12
01/31/98 - Simon Brown - KO6 – Brown was a former champ at 147 and 154.
08/28/98 - Robert Allen - NC4
02/06/99 - Robert Allen - KO7
12/12/99 - Antwun Echols - W12
05/13/00 - Syd Vanderpool - W12
12/01/00 - Antwun Echols - KO10
04/14/01 - Keith Holmes - W12 – Holmes was WBC champ at the time.
09/29/01 - Felix Trinidad - KO12 – Trinidad was 40-0 at the time.
02/02/02 - Carl Daniels - KO11 – Daniels was a former champ at 154.
03/29/03 - Morrade Hakkar - KO9
12/13/03 - William Joppy - W12 – Joppy was WBA champ at the time.
06/05/04 - Robert Allen - W12
09/18/04 - Oscar De La Hoya - KO9
02/19/05 - Howard Eastman - W12

Not exactly the level of competition that Sugar Ray Robinson or Marvin Hagler faced, but not exactly a bunch of stiffs either. Hopkins’ style also has something to do with the perception that his opposition has been weak. Similar again to Roy Jones, Hopkins’ goal in each and every fight is to inflict punishment on his opponent while absorbing as little return fire as possible. A great formula for longevity. Not so great if your goal is to be a fan favorite. A typical Hopkins fights is a one-sided clinic -- tactically brilliant but lacking in drama.

So, back to the question of where he ranks among the all-time greats. Hopkins is a consummate professional with no real weaknesses in the ring. He’s a strong middleweight who – except for a few fights at the very beginning of his career – has never fought at any other weight. There’s every reason to believe that Hopkins would have been very competitive with any middleweight who has ever lived. Hopkins has never been knocked out so, while he may have stopped several of the great middleweights of the past inside the distance, he would make it to the final bell (12 or 15 rounds) against all of them – even Sugar Ray Robinson.

Hopkins would be considered a favorite against Mickey Walker, Charley Burley, Jake LaMotta, Stanley Ketchel, Marcel Cerdan and Tony Zale. It’s also not hard to imagine Hopkins using his superior defensive skills to outpoint Monzon and Hagler – maybe not every time, but more often than not. Harry Greb was the dominant middleweight of his era and was Hopkins’ equal in terms of knowing every trick in the book – even resorting to “dirty” tactics if necessary. But Greb was only 5’8”. Hopkins is 6’1”. Hopkins would be able to use his physical advantages to outpoint Greb in what might very likely have been a foul-filled brawl.

Which brings us to the greatest pound-for-pound fighter of all-time -- Sugar Ray Robinson. Many consider it heresy to suggest that any of today’s fighters could even compete with the legendary Sugar Ray, but that is simply not the case. No question, Robinson was a great middleweight. But he started his career at 135 and welterweight was probably his best weight. Robinson also lost 19 times (against a 173 victories!) so it was possible - incredibly difficult, but possible - to outpoint Robinson. Hopkins is definitely as good or better than some of the fighters that beat Robinson, so why is it inconceivable to think that Hopkins could have done the same? Robinson was unquestionably the better pound-for-pound fighter and fought more quality opponents than any fighter in history. However, at middleweight, Bernard Hopkins would have held his own against the greatest fighter in history.

Labels:

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the author, while obviously knowledgeable about historic boxers' stats and the sport itself, is a little nearsighted in his defintion of "greatest". Sugar Ray Robinson, without question the greatest middleweight boxer and pound-for-pound champion of all time, was so advanced in skill that we still marvel (and teach) at his moves and strategy today. In addition, he fought so many greats - LaMotta, Gavilan, Basilio, Fullmer, etc. -without a second thought, not because he underestimated them, but in fact because he respected them and the sport itself. Hopkins does not do that. Hopkins has carefully chosen his opponents not on skill or because they deserve a shot, but because he feels they are least challenging. He has been so conscious of his record and indifferent to fans' wishes for an 'actual fight' that it's no wonder his win-loss ratio is better than Robinson's. In addition, he's not invincible. Roy Jones put him on the canvas hard and made him look real bad in their fight. LaMotta, for instance, never went down in over a hundred fights. In fact, he did what no man could do to Robinson in over 130 fights -- knocked him down. And what about stamina? Jake LaMotta knocked out Laurence Dautille in the 15th round after a night of playing possum. These are things you need to consider. I would be very careful in stating that he could beat Marvin Hagler, and just because he's a 6-footer doesn't automatically make that the key to victory. There have been so many talented middleweights throughout history. Maybe Hopkins might turn out to be one of them, but I get the feeling as time goes on he'll fade beside the real fighters who fought anytime, anywhere...i.e. "Sugar" Ray Robinson.

3/25/2005 2:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Roy Jones didn't knock Hopkins on the canvas and Hopkins was green still because Jones had over 100 amatuer fights while hopkins had none. Since then, Jones been scared to fight Hopkins because he is a lil bitch.

12/20/2008 10:59 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home